Search found 137 matches

by CHItA
Sat Feb 17, 2018 10:00 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based
Replies: 15
Views: 717

Re: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based

Derk's username is Derky, and I'm Máté. You can find all usernames here . The mentor allocation for projects may change, as we plan to have at least two mentors for each project, and also one mentor shouldn't have too many students, so in general it is best to keep all conversations public, unless y...
by CHItA
Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:36 am
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based
Replies: 15
Views: 717

Re: [GSOC 2018] Revamp PM system to chat based

Keep in mind, that you're free to propose any implementation (as you are also free to propose your own idea as well). Thus everything you read here is more of a suggestion than a requirement.
by CHItA
Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:40 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: Why does Travis fail?
Replies: 9
Views: 583

Re: Why does Travis fail?

It depends which git client you use, the search term i would suggest is "Squash commits". I use the command line, so if you issue git commands from your console, then you want to rebase with the -i switch, and then just write an f for your second commit, and it will be merged into the first one. You...
by CHItA
Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:26 am
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: Why does Travis fail?
Replies: 9
Views: 583

Re: Why does Travis fail?

It failed because your merge commit doesn't follow the commit message format.
by CHItA
Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:39 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Some questions on Session Backend Abstraction
Replies: 1
Views: 360

Re: Some questions on Session Backend Abstraction

Hi All, I am working on the gsoc proposal for Session Backend Abstraction. I have some questions about scope of this project. I have identified following areas which comes under session which needs changes for this project. Session methods in session.php Methods related to view online users. Most i...
by CHItA
Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:44 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Security concern regarding CSP and phpBB
Replies: 3
Views: 243

Re: Security concern regarding CSP and phpBB

I'm not quite sure based on the topic you linked what feature set would qualify as a solution to this problem, so I'm not sure if the following answers any of your questions. That said, I think the best we could do is removing all the inline JS and CSS (which we should do anyway). From that point on...
by CHItA
Sun Jan 28, 2018 10:42 am
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: [GSOC] Add ability to tag specific users in posts using @
Replies: 7
Views: 3169

Re: [GSOC] Add ability to tag specific users in posts using @

HI! this is Avishek Saha. I want to participate in GSOC 2018, so I was thinking of taking up this mentions project as for that. But I am completely new to phpBB. So if anyone can mentor me that will be great!! cheers! We are happy to help you out with getting started if you have any specific questi...
by CHItA
Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:39 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: ACP UX Improvements
Replies: 30
Views: 6876

Re: ACP UX Improvements

The ACP is not unusable because the number of settings available, but because of their organisation (or lack there of). Eg. "Board settings" and "Board preferences" are pretty *beep* names as you don't really know what you would find there. It's both. If you want to toggle a particular feature (say...
by CHItA
Mon Oct 02, 2017 4:20 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: ACP UX Improvements
Replies: 30
Views: 6876

Re: ACP UX Improvements

Throwing out options will not result in better UX. I don't think that it is possible to improve UX without completely redesigning the ACP. I think not giving the User a HUUGE load of settings is already an improvement. Also, it can help supporters since there will be less mistakes and when redesign...
by CHItA
Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:27 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: ACP UX Improvements
Replies: 30
Views: 6876

Re: ACP UX Improvements

Throwing out options will not result in better UX. I don't think that it is possible to improve UX without completely redesigning the ACP.